Arkady ([info]integralthought) wrote,

#amazonfail

An interesting theory has been put forward by [info]tehdely (a former Bantown troll) concerning the whole #amazonfail mess - to wit: that Amazon has been the butt of a subtle and unpleasant trolling.

As a basic summation for anyone who hasn't been following the shitstorm that blew up over on Twitter over the holiday weekend, Amazon suddenly started to blacklist any books with LGBT content from appearing in best-seller lists or search results - in fact, anything that had been tagged as "adult". Complaints received a stock response from Amazon:

In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.


[info]tehdely has theorised that Amazon must have some kind of automatic procedure in place that flags an item as "adult" only after receiving a certain number of complaints about it - you can still find sex toys in search listings, for instance, but of one particular book by Stephen Fry you'll only get the hardback version - because unlike the paperback version, it hasn't been tagged as "gay". So someone - or a group of someones - has been going through tags and using Amazon's own procedures against it, on a major holiday when the customer service department will be operating a skeletal staff (hence the stock response to all the complaints received thanks to #amazonfail). So you end up with a lot of annoyed authors and a very angrily vocal LGBT crowd Tweeting and blogging about it, resulting in a massive PR embarassment for Amazon.

Obviously this has highlighted a definite procedural fail in Amazon's systems - they should not have been so easy to game, after all. But it does beg the question of just who it was who gamed the tagging system? Presumably we are meant to leap to the conclusion that it was religious fundamentalists, particularly as the top results now on a search on "homosexuality" are all Christian books on how to give up being gay. I suspect however that the real culprits are anonymous internet trolls, who no doubt are sitting back and laughing as once again, religious fundametalists and the LGBT movement are at each other's throats with Amazon unwittingly caught up in the middle, "all for teh LULZ!!"

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comments

[info]atara

April 13 2009, 13:09:20 UTC 3 years ago

I put forward a theory of my own, based on the fact that an author who had his sales rank removed in February had it restored just as suddenly about a month later. The "policy" that the customer service rep cited most likely has nothing to do with GLBT books, but since contact centers work on quotas and speed, the real issue was never addressed or communicated to people who could actually solve the problem.

So when Amazon said, "glitch," people came back with "but you said it was policy." That poor customer service drone - she might be having a bad day today. :/

The tagging idea is interesting, but it is something that Amazon should have caught and fixed when it was first brought up. I'm interested to see what their response is going to be today.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…